Is the economic
slog really over?
經濟不景氣真正過去了?
Hello, 2015.
We now are in the sixth
year of economic recovery since the end of the “Great Recession” in mid-2009,
says the National Bureau of Economic Research, a group of academic economists that dates business
cycles. But, if upbeat economic forecasts come true, this could be the first
year that feels like a recovery. There would be huge implications.
It would soothe Americans’ bruised sense of self-worth and alter popular
psychology for the 2016 elections.
It has been a slog. Below,
you’ll find some economic indicators comparing where we are now with the peaks
of the last economic expansion, which ended in the fourth quarter of 2007.
Generally, the numbers aren’t impressive. At best, they show modest gains from
those previous peaks.
Consider:
●The economy’s annualized
output (gross domestic product) of $17.6 trillion is, after adjustment for
inflation, only 8.1 percent higher than its peak in the fourth quarter of 2007.
● Payroll employment of 140 million in November exceeded January
2008’s 138.4 million by a mere 1.2 percent.
● New housing starts of nearly 1 million units in 2014 were
about half of 2005’s peak of 2.1 million units. (But recall: Overbuilding in the early 2000s
contributed to the financial crisis.)
●At 5.8 percent in
November, the unemployment rate remains well above the low of 4.4 percent
in May 2007.
This plodding is over, say
many economists. Or soon will be. IHS Economics, a major forecasting firm,
predicts that GDP will grow 3.1 percent in 2015 and that monthly job creation
will average a solid 230,000. If these gains occur, 2015 will be the recovery’s
best year. Since 2010,annual GDP growth has averaged only 2.2 percent.
The United States would
overshadow Europe and Japan, whose economies are stagnating. “The United States
has been faster at deleveraging [reducing household and business debt burdens]
and increasing bank capital,” argues Nariman Behravesh, IHS’s chief economist.
Europeans and Japanese are still deleveraging. “As consumers deleverage, they
spend less,” he says. “As banks deleverage, they lend less.”
The U.S. economy would
also approach “full employment.” That’s the lowest level of unemployment
consistent with stable inflation. If unemployment falls further, the theory
goes, competition among firms for scarce workers will trigger a wage-price
spiral. The precise unemployment rate for full employment is uncertain and
controversial, though the range is usually put between 4 percent and 6 percent.
Whatever it is, we’ve been
far from it for years. Now we’re closer or, perhaps, already there. Unemployment by year’s end could be as low as 5.4 percent,
says Behravesh. There will also be glad tidings for corporations. Economist
Beth Ann Bovino of Standard & Poor’s expects operating profits to rise
about 6 percent in 2015 and stocks to make a roughly comparable gain.
Naturally, all these
predictions won’t come true. An old military adagewarns that “no battle plan survives contact with the
enemy.” The same can be said of economic forecasts. None completely survives
contact with reality. There’s a long history of surprises — for good and ill —
obliterating plausible predictions. In 2014, the collapse of oil prices and the
war in Ukraine again reminded us of this.
Some threats to the
consensus optimism are plain. Economist David Levy of the Jerome Levy
Forecasting Center judges that there’s a 65 percent chance that slumps and slowdowns in Europe, Japan, China and “emerging market”
countries will cause a global recession that ultimately drags down the United
States. American vulnerability would arise from weaker exports and reduced
foreign profits — they represent almost a third of corporate earnings — as well
as a general blow to confidence.
The Federal Reserve also
poses a danger. It might miscalculate on interest rates. The Fed is widely
expected this year to begin raising short-term rates, which have been near zero
since late 2008. Fed officials have said the increases would be small and slow
so as not to disrupt the recovery. But if investors react by pushing up
long-term rates on home mortgages and corporate bonds, the economy could
suffer. An even bigger surprise would involve higher inflation that causes the
Fed to raise rates more quickly than expected.
It’s worth remembering
that all this occurs against a backdrop of heightened anxiety bred by the
financial crisis and Great Recession. The reaction to these unforeseen
calamities was to hunker down — for both consumers and companies to skimp on
spending. This is the largest cause of the weak recovery. The question now is
whether almost six years of this has had a calming effect — no further disaster
has ensued — and restored some optimism. Is the economic slog really over? Or
are we just fooling ourselves?
By Robert J. Samuelson January 4- Washington Post華盛頓郵報記
07/15/2015
沒有留言:
張貼留言